Researcher & Author: Ghazala Miftah
IDS Mastermind / Architect
Founder/ CEO at Dexign 3D
IDS Mastermind / Architect
Founder/ CEO at Dexign 3D
AIA Commitment 2030
Global decarbonization scenarios currently is dependent highly on the CCS (Carbon Capture & Storage) as a key technology to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from the power and industrial sectors. Few of the large-scale plants are already operating worldwide. This mismatch between our expectations from CCS technology and the reality is caused by many barriers preventing its adoption more widely and in turns not receiving desired results.
CCS is being struggling for a long time now to emerge as a game changing technology against climate change. Billions of capitals have been invested in this technology for positive outcomes, but recent study shows that only 0.1% of carbon emission reductions have taken place until now. Scientists are now assuming we are moving in the wrong direction in handling climate crisis.
Cost of CCS technology is one of the most prominent factors preventing the widespread adoption of this technology. Actual cost estimations are still a challenge for it. Proposed roadmap for CCS technology by IEA requires an additional investment of over 2 – 5.3 trillion till 2050 which is about 6% of the overall
investment needed to achieve 50% reduction in GHG emissions by 2050.
Other issues responsible for no positive outcomes of all the efforts done in dealing climate crisis includes the lack of market mechanisms and fewer incentives to stop CO2 emission sources, inadequate legal framework about the transport and storage along with correct information sharing with public and authorities.
Exxon Mobil response is that the development of CCS technology is significantly limited by the economic and political hurdles. Shell has also proposed the energy scenarios for decarbonization, and other oil and gas companies are also concern about handling this climate crisis and their role in it. Carbon capture technology needs its demonstration at commercial scale along with lowering of the cost affiliated with it.
At this point, uncertainty about all the investments and actions is very obvious.
Under the current circumstances and stage of climate crisis resolution, Dexign 3D has proposed its new climate smart solution for the built environment including new technology C-MG.
IDS climate smart I-BOT w/ C-MG technology by Dexign 3D is currently undergoing through its design and development phase as part of NETs (Negative Emission Technologies) for the built environment in reference to achieve the AIA commitment 2030.
IDS climate smart I -BOT w/ C-MG technology has a different format for carbon handling and GHG emissions reduction process compared to CCS technology, specifically focusing on the built environment.
The roadmap for these technologies includes the integration of three stages: CO2 capture, transport, and storage. However, the mechanism for C-MG technology as part of the climate smart I-BOT is a comprehensive solution that will provide realistic assessment of built environment emissions and the technology specific function in handling it.
Model for IDS climate smart I-BOT w/ C-MG technology will be presented soon by Dexign 3D. The biggest advantage of this solution is its cost effectiveness, ease of implementation and result driven expectations compare to all other technological solutions so far.
We are not promising to instantly solve this issue, nor talking too big to create a turnkey solution, but the mechanism Dexign 3D is bringing through its proprietary platform, IDS: Climate Smart I-BOT with C-MG technology, is truly unique and it focuses on the built environment. We are very optimistic that it will contribute greatly towards solving the climate crisis and is just the right process the world is waiting for.
We assumed for many years that electrification is the most popular way to handle climate crisis but have not seen any improvement in the problem by the efforts done so far. Electrification of automobiles and buildings is a contribution towards solving the issue but needs more strategical thinking in execution models. In the context of global scale, it seems this is not enough.
Our vision towards solving the climate crisis is reality based since we have researched the situation of where the world stands. We understand that all the efforts, policies, solutions proposed, and implementations until now were not result driven and the climate change is aggravating each passing year. There is no sign of crisis declining at this point.
Our research is factual based, and our solution is reality based. No fake promises, no false money-making incentives. We have a strong purpose of making a difference by supporting humanity in this crisis because we care about our people and planet Earth. We want a world with a prosperous future where our upcoming generations flourish and create a better life for all of us.
Global decarbonization scenarios currently is dependent highly on the CCS (Carbon Capture & Storage) as a key technology to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from the power and industrial sectors. Few of the large-scale plants are already operating worldwide. This mismatch between our expectations from CCS technology and the reality is caused by many barriers preventing its adoption more widely and in turns not receiving desired results.
CCS is being struggling for a long time now to emerge as a game changing technology against climate change. Billions of capitals have been invested in this technology for positive outcomes, but recent study shows that only 0.1% of carbon emission reductions have taken place until now. Scientists are now assuming we are moving in the wrong direction in handling climate crisis.
Cost of CCS technology is one of the most prominent factors preventing the widespread adoption of this technology. Actual cost estimations are still a challenge for it. Proposed roadmap for CCS technology by IEA requires an additional investment of over 2 – 5.3 trillion till 2050 which is about 6% of the overall
investment needed to achieve 50% reduction in GHG emissions by 2050.
Other issues responsible for no positive outcomes of all the efforts done in dealing climate crisis includes the lack of market mechanisms and fewer incentives to stop CO2 emission sources, inadequate legal framework about the transport and storage along with correct information sharing with public and authorities.
Exxon Mobil response is that the development of CCS technology is significantly limited by the economic and political hurdles. Shell has also proposed the energy scenarios for decarbonization, and other oil and gas companies are also concern about handling this climate crisis and their role in it. Carbon capture technology needs its demonstration at commercial scale along with lowering of the cost affiliated with it.
At this point, uncertainty about all the investments and actions is very obvious.
Under the current circumstances and stage of climate crisis resolution, Dexign 3D has proposed its new climate smart solution for the built environment including new technology C-MG.
IDS climate smart I-BOT w/ C-MG technology by Dexign 3D is currently undergoing through its design and development phase as part of NETs (Negative Emission Technologies) for the built environment in reference to achieve the AIA commitment 2030.
IDS climate smart I -BOT w/ C-MG technology has a different format for carbon handling and GHG emissions reduction process compared to CCS technology, specifically focusing on the built environment.
The roadmap for these technologies includes the integration of three stages: CO2 capture, transport, and storage. However, the mechanism for C-MG technology as part of the climate smart I-BOT is a comprehensive solution that will provide realistic assessment of built environment emissions and the technology specific function in handling it.
Model for IDS climate smart I-BOT w/ C-MG technology will be presented soon by Dexign 3D. The biggest advantage of this solution is its cost effectiveness, ease of implementation and result driven expectations compare to all other technological solutions so far.
We are not promising to instantly solve this issue, nor talking too big to create a turnkey solution, but the mechanism Dexign 3D is bringing through its proprietary platform, IDS: Climate Smart I-BOT with C-MG technology, is truly unique and it focuses on the built environment. We are very optimistic that it will contribute greatly towards solving the climate crisis and is just the right process the world is waiting for.
We assumed for many years that electrification is the most popular way to handle climate crisis but have not seen any improvement in the problem by the efforts done so far. Electrification of automobiles and buildings is a contribution towards solving the issue but needs more strategical thinking in execution models. In the context of global scale, it seems this is not enough.
Our vision towards solving the climate crisis is reality based since we have researched the situation of where the world stands. We understand that all the efforts, policies, solutions proposed, and implementations until now were not result driven and the climate change is aggravating each passing year. There is no sign of crisis declining at this point.
Our research is factual based, and our solution is reality based. No fake promises, no false money-making incentives. We have a strong purpose of making a difference by supporting humanity in this crisis because we care about our people and planet Earth. We want a world with a prosperous future where our upcoming generations flourish and create a better life for all of us.